Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
|
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The double bar line that can be seen in A was omitted from GE1 (→FE→EE). As no traces of correcting are visible, this is most probably a mistake. The double bar line was restored in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||
|
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The extent of the slur in this bar in A is not clear. As slurs reaching grace notes are used only in exceptional cases, the slur in A may be interpreted as reaching the 2nd quaver or the crotchet on the 2nd beat of the bar. The comparison of all the 12 analogous bars point to the latter possibility. In GE (→FE→EE), the former solution was adopted. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||
|
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
The staccato mark from A was rendered in GE (→FE>EE) as a dot. In the editors' opinion, interpreting that mark as a wedge is much more justified, the arguments being its shape (despite its small size it is a line clearly standing out from among the surrounding dots) and the presence of unmistakable wedges in the analogous bars 12, 44, 90, 94 and 96. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Wedges |
||||||
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||
|
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 2, Mazurka in C major
..
Despite the fairly unambiguous notation of A, in GE (→FE→EE) the end of the slur was placed earlier, above the second quaver b1. Cf. the note to bar 6. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
